PotP: Pachoo on the Propositions
Here's my take on the upcoming California propositions. Hey ma, look! I'm a wannabe political pundit!
Prop 73 - Prohibits abortion until 48 hours after a physician notifies the minor's parent/guardian. Hey let's be realistic, if some teens were forced to notify their parents in the event of an abortion, they'd probably rather go to some dangerous backalley illegal place to get one than face their parents' wrath. To avoid that situation (and to reduce unwanted pregnancies altogether) requires good parent-child communication and basic morals and common sense on the part of the teenager. That type of stuff you just can't legislate. No on 73.
Prop 74 - Increases probationary period for public school teachers from 2 to 5 years before achieving tenure. Why make it even more difficult for people to become teachers? Sure, there are losers and deadbeats who just want to be teachers for an easy paycheck, but if someone really wanted to milk the system, they'll find a way. In the meantime, you'll have a bunch of young teachers walking on eggshells for 5 years performing to the desires of the school boards and evaluators. No on 74.
Prop 75 - Prohibits using public employee union dues for political contributions without individual employee's prior consent. No matter how people spin it, this prop boils down to weakening the power of the unions which typically align with the Democratic party. To be fair, why not make all political contributions subject to voting by the members of the group that contributed? Shouldn't all shareholders be required to give consent when their corporation makes a political contribution? Overall, I think unions do more harm than good when it comes to performance and efficiency. But fair is fair. No on 75.
Prop 76 - Limits state spending to 3 years prior average revenue growth. Gives more power to the Govenor to reduce budget appropriations. Nobody likes to cut programs, especially when half of the programs are pork-barrel projects. Fiscal restraint and moderating increases is necessary to keep debt in check. When there's a deadlock, the govenor (whether it's Democrat or Republican) should be given the power to cut through the BS and cut funding as necessary. Sure, the governor will have the power to cut education and healthcare, but if he's gonna cut that, he should be prepared for any political fallout. Yes on 76.
Prop 77 - Requires 3-member panel of judges selected by legislative leaders to oversee redistricting. The current redistricting program is a complete sham designed to keep and protect political boundaries. This prop replaces it with another sham. C'mon, selected by legislative leaders? Aren't they just going to pick people they like who will protect the current system? I honestly can't think of a new system that would make all things equal, though. No on 77.
Prop 78 - Discount on perscription drugs - allows the Department of Health Services to contract to pharmacists and drug manufacturers. With such a large population, the DHS should have the buying power to levy lower prices. My only fear is that the DHS will be pressured to pick companies and pharmacists that give political contributions. Overall sounds good to me. Yes on 78.
Prop 79 - Perscription drug discounts. Isn't this almost the same at 78. I dunno. Sure, why not? Yes on 79.
Prop 80 - Subjects electric service providers to regulation by the California Public Utilities Commision. Deregulation didn't work, so let's go back to the old system. Yes on 80.


